dc.contributor.author | PRAMAYANTI, YUYUN | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-18T02:37:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-18T02:37:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/22249 | |
dc.description | Latar belakang: Patient safety menjadi persoalan penting tapi terabaikan
dalam pelayanan kesehatan primer. Kurangnya penelitian mengenai safety
culture pada primary health care dibandingkan dengan rumah sakit dan
melihat bagaimana start-up penerapan safety culture di klinik yang belum
terakreditasi, menjadi tujuan dalam penelitian ini.
Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods research.
Kuantitatif menggunakan kuesioner budaya keselamatan pasien yang di
adopsi dari AHRQ dan kualitatif dengan deep interview. Untuk menganalisis
dua jenis metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif, digunakan metode sequential
explanatory.
Hasil dan pembahasan: dari 12 dimensi keselamatan pasien tiga dimensi
mendapatkan skor tertinggi, 7 dimensi memiliki skor rata-rata, Dan dua
dimensi yaitu sistem pelaporan dan hukuman mendapatkan skor terendah.
Tema utama dari wawancara mendalam adalah pemahaman budaya
keselamatan pasien semua staf dan pemangku kepentingan, pelaksanaan
program keselamatan pasien, dan dukungan Manajemen.
Kesimpulan: kami menyimpulkan bahwa akreditasi merupakan faktor
pendukung yang digunakan sebagai kerangka kerja untuk membentuk patient
safety culture. Patient safety bukanlah hal sederhana untuk meningkatkan
kualitas dalam pelayanan kesehatan. Dibutuhkan pendekatan multifaset dan
komprehensif untuk membangun dan memelihara penerapan budaya
keselamatan.
Kata kunci: patien safety, klinik | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Patient safety is an important but neglected issue in primary
health care. The lack of research on safety culture in primary health care
compared to hospitals and finding out how start-up clinic who has not been
accredited, became the objective in this study.
Methods: This research is a mixed methods research. The research
quantitatively used patient safety culture questionnaire, adopted from AHRQ
and qualitatively used deep interview. In order to conduct and analyse both
of quantitative and qualitative methods, the researcher deployed sequential
explanatory method.
Results: From 12 dimension of patient safety, three dimensions in high score,
7 dimensions in medium score, but two dimensions were reporting system and
punishment in low score. The major themes based on the deep interview
conducted were the comprehension of patient safety culture of all staff and
stakeholders, the implementation of patient safety programme, and
management support.
Conclusion: We concluded that accreditation is a sustaining factor that can
be used as a framework for shaping patient safety culture. Patient safety is
not a simple technique to gain quality in healthcare. We need continuous,
multifaceted, and comprehensive approach to establish and maintain the
implementation of safety culture.
Keywords: Patien safety; Primary Health care | en_US |
dc.language.iso | other | en_US |
dc.publisher | MMR UMY | en_US |
dc.subject | Patien safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Primary Health care | en_US |
dc.title | ANALISIS SAFETY CULTURE KLINIK PRATAMA FIRDAUS YOGYAKARTA | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |